Archive for November, 2008

Reverse Merger and Public Shells

tiberguy asked:


Reverse mergers are considered as a worthwhile pursuit by many private company CEO’s and CFO’s and they contemplate the day when their up-and-coming young company can come into the fold of the capital markets as a publicly listed company.

Nevertheless, there are many ways that a private business can use to go public and engage in capital formation. The most common is the IPO (Initial Public Offering). An IPO is when a previously closely held private company first makes an offer to sell its shares to the investing public.

When a private company visits the requirements needed to do a reverse merger – at times called a reverse takeover – with a shell corporation, it is as a means for becoming a publicly traded company quickly and perhaps offering the private company founders an exit strategy.

In the instance above, the publicly traded company is referred to as a “shell,” because all that remains of the original business is the corporate organization and trading structure.

In public shell reverse mergers the shareholders of a private business purchase control of the public shell, and then merge it with the private business. The private company’s shareholders get the biggest portion of the shares of the shell company, in that way keeping control of its board of directors.

Yet and still, the finer nuances pertaining to a reverse merger are countless, and possibly an overview of the character of a reverse merger with a public shell is an item that should be broached with a competent securities attorney with a vast understanding of all the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) rules and regulations.

When considering a reverse merger with a shell company, a legion of items command an answer. Crucial concepts spring forward, including the following: business plan, private placement memorandums (PPM), market makers, public float, mergers and acquisitions (M&A), form S-8 stock for company founders and directors, piggy back registration rights, regulation D (reg. d) rule 504, rule 505, and rule 506, SEC accounting practices, strategic planning, rules about raising capital, NASD broker/dealers, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The best going public advice should be sought before contemplating a reverse merger, since many private company officers are inexperienced and not aware of the pitfalls of going public via a reverse merger with a public shell.

A few of the benefits as the result of taking a private company public with a reverse merger are better ways to get capital, since the sources available are more available versus what a private company can attract. Furthermore, if there is a high enough interest from the investing public, investment attention regarding the business grows, it could provide a secondary trading market for the company’s stock. The company can also keep key personnel by offering stock incentives. The resulting public company’s stock can also be provided as currency for acquiring other businesses (Mergers and Acquisitions).

The countless advantages of going public with your company far prevail over the option of remaining a private concern. The esteem related with a publicly traded corporation is a plus; the superior circumstances for raising capital for company growth are exemplary reasons for becoming a public company. A reverse merger with a public shell company has its place within the available go public strategies.



MARYBELLE

Tags: , ,

How do I reference multiple company acquisitions in my resume?

Unmannered asked:


I have been working at the same “company” for almost 8 years now but we have gone through several acquisitions and therefore name changes. I have also had several different positions while I am here. I am having a hard time trying to display the acquisitions on my resume in a clear manner. Does anyone have any advice on a good way to do this?

LONNIE

Business Broker Versus Merger and Acquisition Advisor

Dave Kauppi asked:


Most business owners only sell one business in their lifetime. The results of that sale can have a major impact on the financial future of the family. For most business sales we recommend that the seller engage a professional specializing in business sales to assist. There are two broad categories of professionals that engage in business sales business brokers and merger and acquisition advisors.

What should the seller be looking for? This article will discuss the type of services offered by both groups and help the business seller decide which professional to use.

The first criteria is type of business. Generally, business brokers specialize in “Main Street” types of businesses such as dry cleaners, gas stations, restaurants, and convenience stores. M&A advisors specialize in more B2B types of businesses such as manufacturers, distributors, information technology firms, etc.

Size of Business BB’s specialize in businesses under $1.5 million in revenues and M&A’s represent larger businesses or smaller businesses with a high component of technology or intellectual property.

The Targeted Buyer BB’s are generally targeting individual buyers while M&A’s are seeking to locate corporate buyers.

Business Valuation BB’s specialize in commodity type businesses that have “rule of thumb’ valuations that are consistently applied to arrive at a business selling price. There is usually a pretty narrow range of valuations applied to these businesses. M&A’s are recommended where there can be a broad interpretation of “strategic value” and rules of thumb do not apply. A high component of Intellectual Property, a unique niche, a hard to penetrate customer base are characteristics that can demand strategic value and purchase prices can vary widely.

Complexity of Transaction BB’s are generally selling to individual buyers that have a finite approach structuring the transaction. The contracts are usually fairly straight forward and the negotiations focus on price, financing, and seller notes. For the M&A’s the targeted audience is the corporate buyer with vast experience in acquiring businesses. They employ both an internal legal team and outside council and make the purchase contracts quite complex. The number one goal is protecting the corporation. The contracts are 35 pages of complex legal language and schedules of reps and warranties. The seller will need someone that is familiar in navigating in that environment. Corporations generally send in a due diligence team that is well versed on finding every little wart in a seller company and will attempt to reduce transaction value during the process. The seller will need good advisors to offset these pros.

Exclusivity because the BB’s are targeting individual buyers, their audience is vast so exclusivity is sometimes required and sometimes not required. Business sellers often engage multiple non exclusive BB’s to insure the broadest coverage in presenting their business to the buyer audience. BB’s are often part of a network of BB’s to help broaden this exposure. Sunbelt Business Brokers and BBN are two very good networks.

M&A’s require exclusivity because they are targeting corporate buyers and the audience of potential buyers is finite. These corporate buyers have M&A departments or sometimes the president handles the process. If a target is presented to a corporate buyer by more than one professional the credibility immediately drops and the chance of serious interest drops significantly.

Number of Clients Represented BB’s want to represent as many business for sale as they can. When contacting their vast network of individual buyers it is a real benefit to have a vast inventory of companies. Because on this, their approach is more of a mass mailing, mass email, post the business on a business for sale Web site, type of approach and their attention is spread over 25 or more simultaneous clients.

M&A’s usually limit their number of engagements to 3 or 4 per professional at a time. Their approach is very hands on and labor intensive. M&A’s usually rely on a direct selling approach of calling the buyers and talking with the M&A department or the president. Often M&A’s will have specific industry niches and will have a customized data base of contacts. They often have had several prior contacts with the buyers and are able to penetrate the call screening that is set up to protect these individuals. A corporate buyer does not buy through a posting on a business for sale Web Site. A corporate buyer will open 2% or less of letter solicitations. A corporate buyer will read less than 1% of unsolicited and unknown emails. Corporate buyers demand personal and professional contact to get their interest.

Up Front or Monthly Fees BB’s generally will charge a minor up front fee to begin the engagement or have a simplified valuation completed. Generally there is no monthly fee charged. M&A’s generally charge either a substantial up front fee or a monthly fee in the $3500 to $10,000 per month range depending on the size of the business.

Success Fees BB’s generally charge a success fee of 10% of transaction value. M&A’s generally have a sliding scale based on the anticipated size of the business. The known Wall Street firms that sell the mega businesses will not touch a transaction where they are not guaranteed $1 million in fees. The big regional firms require at least $750,00. The M&A firms that deal in the lower end usually charge considerably less than that with a minimum or $150,000 cash at close. If your transaction value is in the $10 million range, count on paying your M&A firm $300K to $400K.

Conclusions The deciding factor is in cost benefit. An M&A firm is going to cost a lot of money and you are going to be paying either an up front or monthly fees without a guarantee of success. If your business is smaller and is a commodity type business or Main Street business where the target buyer is an individual, an M&A firm will not add much value and is not worth the fee.

If your business is larger, complex, unusual, strategic, with a high component of intellectual property or technology and subject to a broad interpretation of value in the marketplace, an M&A firm is the right choice. In the final analysis, is a swing of 20% in your company’s selling price worth $5,000 per month for 8 months?



OPHELIA

Tags: , ,

Mergers, Acquisitions and Ecommerce the Current Policies of Business Expansion!

Anne Catherine asked:


Mergers and Acquisitions are the go of the day. The acronym M&A as is commonly used for the purpose is almost necessary and the companies are feeling the need of an M&A more and more. Cross border mergers and the acquisitions is one step that every big concern tries to apply in order to increase its brand name and not to say profits also. The best part is that today the bigger concerns of the developed countries are interested in expanding their business in the developing and under developed countries also. Companies are buying and selling stakes all over the world and are also interested in opening up their outlets in such countries that were unthinkable a few years back.

Talking about mergers and acquisitions, the foreign countries are growing more and more interested in India. The lucrative market of India and China are proving to be head turners and countries like the US and the UK are turning their attention towards India and China. The unthinkable is happening inspite of all the threats from the anti social elements like terrorism that is very rampant especially in India. It is really a matter to reckon that today we have exclusive showrooms of luxury cars in the markets of India. The same India that tops the list in such categories as poverty, population, maternity death, illiteracy etc. The recent Audi and BMW showrooms that opened up in Gurgaon are examples. Not to mention the exclusive showrooms of luxury brands like Armani, Versace, CK, Tag Heuer and the list just goes on.

In India big concerns are willing to make investments. Recently, the Emaar group that has the distinction of building Burj Dubai the tallest building in the world is taking interest in the market of India. They are coming in the market with quite a few projects and as they say “a dream for India”. The recent venture of the big shots like Vodafone into the Indian market, and the venture of the Indian concerns into the international market like that of Tata, Reliance, and the Aditya Birla group is indicator of the new trends that are coming up in the field of modern day business. Intra country expansion of companies is a matter of the yesteryears. Today, the business houses are growing more and more ambitious and are going beyond the geographical limits of their countries in order to brighten their business prospects. One very important but seldom mentioned factor that has opened up India to the world view is the glamour world or to be precise Bollywood as the Indian film industry is referred to as.

Coming back to the tools of expanding business, nowadays all the business concerns be it a big business house or a tiny one, is much willing to have an online presence or to be particular an estore. Ecommerce is the go of the day and is proving to be immensely helpful in the growth of business. Nowadays a productive , ecommerce solution along with a well designed , ecommerce web site is enough to run a business online. Just get in touch with a good , software company from where one can get services depending on the budget and the scale of business one is dealing in. If you are price conscious get in touch with an , offshore software development company for low priced premium solutions!



JACQUES

Tags: , ,

Am I getting screwed over in the company acquisition?

nimbused33 asked:


I work for a tech company that is being acquired by a much larger one.

I have been working as a full time contractor for a couple of months, but for the past couple of weeks, my boss has been “meaning to” give me full time employee status with benefits. We at least have an oral agreement.

He just told me that if the acquire takes place, “things could happen”, and if I was to be dropped, I would get a month’s worth of severance pay.

I feel like I’m getting royally screwed. What options do I have? (no pun intended)

VALENTINE

Mergers and acquisitions

Verena Veneeva asked:


During the last century the concept of business went through major changes in terms of the company ownership (Papers4you.com, 2006). Nowadays, fierce competition is no longer only in the access to market, but also in what regards to business ownership. Most of times, deals involving mergers and acquisition involve billions and are reported in newspapers all the time. The process of globalisation had an increasing effect on access to foreign firms’ ownership control, and thus becoming the process of controlling other firms more usual. The traditional family business concept is now under threat and the concept of business has changed as a consequence of the trend.

Basically the operation of merger and acquisition is defined as when two companies get together, either by resulting on a new firm or by one being controlled by the other. The former form of merging firms is known as concentration and defined as A+B = C and the later is known as incorporation and represented by A + B = A. Another important issue is related to the nature of the firm business activity or the market in which they operate. A process of merging companies is a strategy of diversification of the business and can be of three forms. Vertical diversification occurs when two or more firms in different stages in the value chain are merged into the same company. Horizontal diversification is present when the merging occurs between firms operating in different business (e.g. Virgin). Finally, geographical diversification happens when firms expand their territorial control by merging or acquiring companies operating in different geographical location.

There is a huge number of examples on mergers and acquisitions. Although only the one involving higher amounts of money become known to the public. And it is so widely used that there is also a great number of academic literature devoted to the study of the phenomenon.

The consequences of a higher number of mergers and acquisitions is a higher concentration of the business, which implies possibly implies a higher level of monopoly (under certain circumstances) and the business ownership control in the hands of few (Papers4you.com, 2006). In both cases there are losses for the economy, via the increase of the prices and because the overall economy becomes more dependent on few economic agents. On the other hand, the concentration of activities permits higher levels of profits (when economies of scale and economies of scope are present) and eventually increasing the investment levels in the country (in the case that these profits are reinvested).

References

Papers For You (2006) “P/B/600. International mergers and acquisitions: literature analysis”, Available from http://www.coursework4you.co.uk/sprtfina42.htm [19/06/2006]

Papers For You (2006) “P/F/393. Mergers and acquisitions: criteria of success”, Available from Papers4you.com [19/06/2006]



MAYBELLE

Tags: , ,

In-Depth Look – Corporate Defaults & Leveraged Buyouts – Bloomberg

Bloomberg asked:


First Look at CLOs – Analysis and Discussion with Randy Schwimmer of Churchill Financial: Collateralized Loan Obligations May Need TALF (Bloomberg News)

LANE

RuneScape BuyOuts

glenthegoalsguy asked:


thegrandexchange.com Merch Clans in RuneScape often encourage inexperienced players to participate in buyouts where the clan leaders take little or no risk by enouraging other players to buy from them at inflated prices

VELMA

Does this prove that the Iraq War is about oil and Corporatism?

Middleclassandnotquiet asked:


Mussolini said “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.”

The thousands protesting Monday in Iraq were not just protesting the US but US oil companies. a new oil law requiring Iraq to open up its fields to control by Western corporations. This was kept secret from both the Iraqi and American peoples, but the draft has now been submitted to the Iraqi parliament for its approval. The law would transform Iraq’s huge oil reserve from a nationally owned resource to a privatization model, opening two-thirds of the known oil fields to foreign control.

The IDP website states: “Enjoying enormous trade and investment potential, Iraq has the resources to become the highest revenue generating country in the Middle East region. The efforts to aid Iraq’s development have resulted in heavy international donations, including a donation of $18.4 billion by the US Congress”

http://www.iraqdevelopmentprogram.org/index.htm

http://www.bushagenda.net/article.php?id=165

SHELLI

The Biggest Banking Mergers & Acquisitions in Turkey

John C. Arkin asked:


making some economic reforms in order to become part of the European Union. As a result, the Turkish banking industry has seen many changes. These changes include massive restructuring and various banking mergers that have made their marks on the financial history of Turkey.

You can see the biggest of these banking mergers and acquisitions in the following:

Denizbank AS

First, Denizbank was a state bank of Turkey.  In the early 1990s, Turkey decided to merge together some of its state banks, and Denizbank and Emlakbank has merged.

After this banking merger, Denizbank seemed not too much energized. So Turkey decided to privatize it, it became the target of acquisition for Zorlu Holdings.  Under umbrella of Zorlu Holdings, Denizbank flourished and became one of the biggest banks in Turkey.  Now, Dexia who is a banking giant of Belgium owns Denizbank.

Finansbank AS

We can easily say that Finansbank is always one of the leading banks in Turkey.  It was established by Husnu Ozyegin, a leader in the banking industry of Turkey, in 1987.  However, National Bank of Greece acquired Finansbank in 2006. This acquisition becomes the largest financial transaction ever held between Turkey and Greece.

Oyak Bank

Oyak Bank used to be a branch of the First National Bank of Boston in Turkey.  After, Oyak Group bought the majority of shares of  Oyak Bank.  In 2001, Sumerbank and Oyak Bank realized a banking merger in the umbrella of Oyakbank, and expanded its network all over Turkey and Europe.

Turkiye Finans

One of the most interesting banking mergers histories is Turkiye Finans’s. Anadolu Finans Kurumu AS of the Boydak Holding and the Family Finans Kurumu AS of the Ulker Group has married and the merger which was finalized in 2005 was the product of this marriage. Both parent companies are recognized leaders in Turkey’s trading and industrial sector.

Turkiye Garanti Bankasi

Garanti Bank which is based in Ankara first started as an independent and privately owned commercial. In 1983 it was acquired by Dogus Group, a Turkish conglomerate that has interest in various sectors, including finance, this acquisition led to the growth of Garanti. In 2005, General Electric and Dogus Group have agreed to divide shares of Garanti in equal, thus creating an equal partnership within the bank.

Yapi Kredi Bankasi

Yapi Kredi Bankasi was born with one of the most successful banking merger history of Turkey. The merger was realized by two parties, Yapi ve Kredi Bankasi and Kocbank AS, both respected entities in Turkey’s banking sector.

The banking merger between these two entities is considered to be the biggest merger in the history of banking in Turkey.  In 2006, the last step of the merger was finalized and as a result, Kocbank was dissolved and Yapi Kredi Bankasi was emerged.



STEPHANE

Tags: , ,